Change!?!, Decline/Growth, Young Adults
I am not Brethren
I am not Presbyterian, I am not Calvary Chapel, I am not Vineyard, I am not Pentecostal, I am not Catholic, and I am not Brethren. I am myself, a sinner saved by grace, a convert to the way of Jesus, a child of the Living God.
Having come to the church by conversion, not birth, I have like many, meandered through denominational identities. One of the results of that experience is that the only name that I’m willing to keep is Christian. And to be honest (or better said accurate), the last ten years has heaped so much social baggage onto the title Christian, that even it, usually makes me wince. I most prefer just to say that I am a follower of Jesus. If you don’t know this then you should; Christian youth culture burgeons with similar sentiment.
Postmodern theologians regularly postulate, that the world is becoming post-Christian… they are probably right about that. But also true and equally important is the fact that the church is becoming post-denominational. Those of us who’ve come to Christ because of a change of heart or mind, rarely feel connected to the history and evolution of the denominational hierarchy that hosts or owns our property. Postmodern converts identify with God, and one another, based on a set of shared beliefs, not the name of a schism or its founder. This is an uncomfortable truth for folks that have life-long lived with the name of a denomination etched into their family and its history. But to reach the emerging generations, we must allow them to keep their identities, and not expect them to adopt ours.
And in a way, what I said at the beginning of this discourse is wholly and hugely inaccurate.
I am Presbyterian, and Calvary, and Vineyard, Pentecostal and Catholic. And yes, I am Brethren as well. Not the Brethren of the past, but the Brethren of tomorrow; and so are the emerging generations of which I am a part. We are a mosaic of traditions, tapestries of faith and practice, and although we understand the importance of the past, we are far more interested in the needs of the future. And we will only take with us, that which we think rings true.
The world is very different than it was forty years ago, and the global amalgamation of Christian ideas has left us needing a church whose theology is refined beyond denominational differences. We long to embrace our cousins from every corner of the family of Christ, and differentiate ourselves by our praxis, not our assumptions.
And praxis is meat of the matter for the emerging generations. It’s what we do, not what we think that defines us. In this way the Emerging Church and Brethren culture have much in common. Lay led, service oriented, egalitarian, ecologically sensitive, intentionally peaceful and dedicated to simple living; all these things are true of both Brethren and Emerging. Indeed, the Emerging Church and the Brethren persona is a match so natural, that their corollaries seem a machination of Divinity.
The question is what do we do with this opportunity? Can we find the courage to embrace the emerging generations and allow them to inherit our mission and revitalize the church? Or will we insist that they adopt our identities, and force them out on their own, to form their faith families without us.
16 Jul 2007 Mike Salerno
Hi Mike,
Welcome to the site! Its good to see your post. In case anyone is wondering, I want to name that you are on pastoral staff at the Pomona Fellowship congregation. This will give others some other context of who you are and why you are here. 🙂
When you say that you are the Brethren of the tomorrow, what are your thoughts about the future of the CoB? Coming into our church from other denominational experiences, what are the good things that you see? What are the challenges facing us that you see?
The former paragraph could be a whole `nother post that all of us could try to get around. For the good and the challenges can help to form our prayer with God.
THanks for sharing!
Jeff Glass
Mike,
I hear what you are saying, and I think that it is one of the hardest things for established folks to understand. Many of them are here because of birth, heritage, names of founders. Many also fear that new people, emergent people won’t embrace what they hold sacred. The reality is that they might embrace it, but only if it rings true and authentic to them.
I think it is McLaren who has been using “followers in the way of Jesus” to describe himself and what he seeks to be about instead of Christian. I agree that there is so much baggage, and we really must find language that invites people to wonder and inquire about who we are, rather than dismiss the category that they already have pegged in their mind for the group.
Shalom,
Russ Matteson
Modesto, CA